One of the aspects that raises the most questions when starting an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment is embryo quality. Patients may hear phrases such as “we have a grade A embryo”, “our best embryo is an AA blastocyst” or “we are going to transfer a good-quality embryo”. But what do these classifications actually mean?
Embryo assessment plays an essential role in identifying those with the greatest potential for implantation and pregnancy. However, it is important to remember that embryo grading provides an estimate based on morphological features and developmental progress. An embryo with an excellent grade does not guarantee pregnancy, just as an embryo with an intermediate grade may still result in the birth of a healthy baby. Each case must always be assessed individually.
Below, we explain how embryos develop during the first few days after fertilisation, the criteria embryologists use to assess them, what grades A, B, C and D mean, and how the embryo selected for transfer is chosen during assisted reproduction treatment.
An embryo develops following the fertilisation of an egg by a sperm cell. In assisted reproduction, fertilisation can take place through conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Once the egg has been fertilised, it begins a continuous process of cell division that drives embryo development. During the first few days of culture in the laboratory, embryologists carefully monitor how each embryo develops, assessing its characteristics and identifying those with the greatest implantation potential.

Embryos develop rapidly during the first few days after fertilisation.
| Day of development | Day of development | Características principales |
| Day 1 | Zygote | Embryologists check that fertilisation has occurred normally. The embryo should have two pronuclei — one maternal and one paternal — and two polar bodies. |
| Day 2 | Cleavage-stage embryo | The embryo usually has between 2 and 4 cells. The number of blastomeres, cell symmetry, fragmentation and any signs of multinucleation are assessed. |
| Day 3 | Cleavage-stage embryo | The embryo will usually have between 6 and 10 cells, with around 8 cells considered the expected stage of development. This is an important point for assessing embryo quality. |
| Day 4 | Morula | The cells begin to compact and become increasingly difficult to distinguish from one another. The embryo continues developing towards the blastocyst stage. |
| Day 5 | Expanded blastocyst | The inner cell mass, which will develop into the baby, the trophectoderm, which will mainly form the placenta, and the blastocoel can now be distinguished. Day 5 is the most common day for embryo transfer. |
| Day 6 | Expanded blastocyst | Some embryos reach the blastocyst stage one day later. Although, in general, Day 6 blastocysts have slightly lower implantation rates than Day 5 blastocysts, they still have a significant and realistic chance of resulting in pregnancy. |
Not all embryos develop at exactly the same rate. Some reach the blastocyst stage on Day 5, while others do so on Day 6. This does not necessarily mean that Day 6 embryos are not viable. Developmental timing should always be considered alongside the morphological assessment carried out by the embryology laboratory.
Embryo grading involves assessing their appearance under the microscope as well as how they progress during culture. There is no single universal grading system, although many laboratories follow recommendations from organisations such as the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the Spanish Association for the Study of Reproductive Biology (ASEBIR) and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine.
Embryologists assess several parameters:
In many laboratories, early-stage embryos on Days 2 and 3 are classified using a straightforward grading system.
| Embryo grade | Characteristics | Reproductive potential |
| Grade A | Symmetrical cells, minimal or no fragmentation and appropriate development. | Very high. These embryos have the most favourable morphological prognosis. |
| Grade B | Good-quality embryos with minor differences in cell symmetry or slight fragmentation. | High. Many successful pregnancies result from grade B embryos. |
| Grade C | Moderate fragmentation or less uniform development. | Intermediate. These embryos can implant and result in an ongoing pregnancy. |
| Grade D | Significant morphological or developmental abnormalities. | More limited, although assessment must always take the individual clinical context into account. |
Once an embryo reaches Day 5 or Day 6, the A, B, C and D grading system is generally no longer used in the same way. At this stage, blastocysts are commonly assessed using the Gardner and Schoolcraft grading system, which considers three aspects.
1. Early blastocyst. The blastocoel is beginning to form.
2. Blastocyst with a clearly defined but still relatively small cavity.
3. Full blastocyst, with the cavity occupying almost the entire embryo.
4. Expanded blastocyst. The cavity has increased in size and the zona pellucida is beginning to thin.
5. Hatching blastocyst. The embryo is beginning to emerge from the zona pellucida as it prepares for implantation.
6. Fully hatched blastocyst. The embryo has completely emerged from the zona pellucida.
Some common examples include:
| Grade | What it means |
| 4AA | An expanded blastocyst with an excellent inner cell mass and excellent trophectoderm. This is one of the most favourable morphological grades. |
| 5AA | A blastocyst that has started to hatch and has excellent-quality inner cell mass and trophectoderm. |
| 4AB | An expanded blastocyst with an excellent inner cell mass and good-quality trophectoderm. |
| 3BB | A full blastocyst with good-quality inner cell mass and trophectoderm. It is still considered an embryo with good implantation potential. |
| 5BC | A hatching blastocyst with a good-quality inner cell mass and lower-quality trophectoderm. Its implantation potential may be lower, although it can still result in pregnancy. |
A more favourable morphological grade is generally associated with a higher likelihood of implantation, but it does not guarantee pregnancy. Similarly, blastocysts graded BC can result in the birth of a baby. Morphological quality is only one of the factors considered by the medical and embryology teams when selecting an embryo for transfer.
The aim of the embryology laboratory is to identify the embryo with the greatest implantation potential. However, the decision is not based solely on morphological grading. Other factors are also taken into account, including:
No. Embryo quality is one of the most important factors influencing the chances of pregnancy, but it is not the only one. Even an embryo with excellent morphology may fail to implant because of chromosomal abnormalities that cannot be detected under the microscope, endometrial factors or other biological factors that cannot be assessed through morphology alone. Likewise, embryos with intermediate grades have resulted in thousands of successful births.
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine & ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology.
The Istanbul Consensus Workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting.
Human Reproduction.
2011;
1270-1283
International consensus on embryo evaluation criteria:
https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/26/6/1270/2914112
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Good practice recommendations for add-ons in reproductive medicine.
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).
2023;
Recommendations on good practice for add-ons in reproductive medicine:
https://www.eshre.eu/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Gardner DK., Schoolcraft WB.
In vitro culture of human blastocysts.
CRC Press.
1999;
Capítulo sobre cultivo in vitro de blastocistos humanos:
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine & European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
The Vienna Consensus: assessment of human embryos.
Human Reproduction Open.
2024;
Update on the consensus regarding the evaluation of human embryos:
https://academic.oup.com/hropen/article/2024/1/hoae001/7581708